Love me or else?
I heard someone say recently that they didn't believe the Church mentioned hell near enough anymore. I've thought alot about that. I can agree with him that it isn't mentioned as much as it used to be; however, I'm not convinced that is such a bad thing.
While I completely agree that hell and eternal separation from God are biblical realities, I question the motive of using it to solicite a response of faith and love in Christ. Getting my child to love me through spending time with him, loving him, protecting him, teaching him, and getting to know him is one thing. Telling him that either he loves me or he is tossed out on his ear forever is quite another.
It seems to me the motives are different, though I am by no means an expert on the issue. On one hand, the motive seems to be to get people to do something akin to registering to be in a organization. You do it, you are good and you belong and we love you for it. You don't, and you are an outsider and we don't have any use for you. One the other hand, the more difficult one, is to try to get people to understand the life long benifits of enjoying life in the organization. You let them explore the benefits of joining, let them seek, wrestle, question, doubt and reach their own decision rather than force them into joining out of fear and intimidation.
If God wanted to make us love him, he could have just put Adam and Eve in the garden without the tree, i.e. the option to choose otherwise. Loving him at that point would have not been an option. Would that truly have been love? Getting people to make a decision for Christ by scaring them with a promise of hell seems to be similar in my mind to not giving them an option to love. Who wants to burn eternally? No one I'm quite sure. Who wants to live out a relationship with a God who is amazing enough to make doing so our choice? That is the question.
